Capacity, not just catalogue.
Custom development when the catalogue stops short, a published automation roadmap, and a network that lets throughput grow without waiting for one building to expand.
Six ways we get pulled into a programme.
Most engagements start with a reagent that almost works. The work is closing the gap between "almost" and a validated, documented supply.
Magnetic Bead Customisation
Conjugate your antibody or ligand to 50 nm – 4.5 µm magnetic particles, with coupling density, blocking and release chemistry developed against your target cell.
Discuss a projectGMP Protein Expression & Purification
Constructs designed by the model, expressed in E. coli, HEK293 or CHO, then scaled through process development into GMP manufacturing.
Discuss a projectGene Editing Services
CRISPR and knock-in/knock-out engineering for cell lines and primary cells, with off-target assessment and clonal characterisation.
Discuss a projectFormulation Development
Buffer, excipient and lyophilisation development for unstable proteins and reagents, including stability-indicating assay design.
Discuss a projectProtein Characterisation
Identity, purity and activity packages — SEC-HPLC, SDS-PAGE, MS, endotoxin, residual host-cell protein and cell-based potency.
Discuss a projectCAR-NK Process Support
End-to-end process consulting for CAR-NK development, from vector and electroporation strategy to expansion and release testing.
Discuss a projectThree tiers of capacity.
Start at bench scale and move up as the programme grows. Every tier runs under the same methods and the same quality system, so moving up does not mean re-qualifying the work.
A named scientist runs your design at the bench — small batches, tight iteration, judgement on every decision that the model cannot make.
- Named application scientist per project
- 1–5 L bench scale
- 7–10 day typical turnaround
Liquid handling and digital work instructions take over the repetitive transfer steps, so the same team carries more concurrent projects without losing oversight.
- Automated liquid handling on core assays
- Digital work instructions
- Concurrency up ~3×
A scheduling layer routes batches across qualified sites. Throughput becomes a function of the network, not of one building.
- Multi-site capacity routing
- Standardised data return
- Order-to-result SLA
One order. Many benches.
Academic core facilities and specialist laboratories already own capacity that sits idle between grants. We qualify that capacity, standardise the data it returns, and route work to it — so a customer sees one contract and one report.
One specification, one contract, one point of contact — regardless of where the work runs.
Each partner facility is audited on method fit, data format and turnaround before it receives work.
The scheduler assigns each batch to the bench with the right capability and free capacity.
Results come back in one format, under our quality system, with our name on the report.
The facility can run the assay to our written method, not an approximation of it.
Results return in our schema — raw where it matters, summarised where it does not.
Documented training, equipment qualification and deviation handling.
A committed window per batch, with escalation when it slips.
Your first call is a scientist, not a sales rep.
Application support sits between your protocol and our roadmap. The team has run these workflows inside instrument and reagent companies before — which is why the questions they ask on the first call are the ones that decide whether a project is feasible.
- Protocol review before you commit to a reagent
- Failure-mode triage on existing workflows
- Direct line into product development for custom builds
Runs the first technical call, reviews the protocol, and stays on the project through transfer — the same person, not a rotating account team.
Tell us what the reagent has to do.
Send the target, the assay and the constraints. We will come back with a feasibility view and an honest answer about whether we are the right partner.
